All entries for Thursday 10 January 2013
January 10, 2013
i am in GROUPA-TEAM4.
Our group is responsible for the fourth question-- companre and contrast R&M first and then try tointegrated DFSS into the R&M case.
In my personal opnion it is a difficule question.
After i read the topic our group need to answer, the first thing i do is to search the information about R&M online.
Unfortunately, i found almost nothing.
Then i have to read the material again and again.
I think the artical is difficult to understand.
After nearly 5 hours heat discussion with my parteners i quit understand the meaning of DFSS AND R&M CASE
in my understanding,
the core concept of DFSS is to redesign things to meet customer requirement and achieve higher level of Six Sigma. The reasons why the organizations should use DFSS is becaue the customer requirements can not meet via only improving the production process.
R&M case is the evidence the suppliers shown to the customers that their products meet their reliability and maintainability requirements.
There are lots of similarites between two system.
Both of them are based on VOC --voice of customer
Both of them are based on statistic evidence
However, DFSS is a wider system and R&M is narrower.
R&M can used as a tool to make the DFSS more reliable
What's more, if now i am the owner of a company, i am now using DFSS approach. I wanna add R&M into the product life cycle.
In my personal opinion, i do not need to do a lot.
Because, R&m CAN be ragard as a tool to give more evidence to the customer that the product is reliable and have been measured.
our group spent around 10 or more hours to prepare this persentation.
We have searched lots of informations on this topic
Although this topic is quit tricky, it pushes me to learn more during the process of preparing it.
In addition, i feel happy to work with my parteners.
i hope all of you can enjoy our presentation tomorrow