All entries for Friday 15 April 2011
April 15, 2011
Assuming ignore uniform motion situation. When the object and the direction of the force consistent, force will produce acceleration. Similarly, when two kinds of thinking are at the same direction, it will produce thinking acceleration. However, when two kinds of thinking are at the opposite direction, thinking will do slower movement. Is this good or bad ?...........No one object can do acceleration forever. Thus, it is inevitable to do slower movement because of opposite direction. But........should we resist this opposite direction or accept opposite direction?
Force and opposite force are existed at the same time, the stronger force, the stronger resistance. How about thinking? Is it the stronger resistance , the stronger progress.........? Is it the similar principle ? or not ?.....I do not know now.
In the real world, why do people misunderstand each other during their communication ? Sometimes, people will feel that it is not easy to communicate with some ones, why this phenomenon exsit ? It is because of thinking refraction. When light from one medium to another medium, it occurs refraction. Whether is it the similar principle that when thinking from one person to another person will occur refraction ? That is why people misunderstand others or be misunderstood.
Do not exist complete understanding. For example, when many individuals appreciate the same music, different people have different understandings and feelings about the same song or dance. Even if someone who is the artist's best friend or wife or husband, their understanding still exist a little gap with the artist himself or herself. In other words, thinking will occur refraction duiring the communication. What ranges are the resonance areas?
Climate change & KBAM (knowledge-based asset management)
In today's class, we have an interesting discussion about whether the 'climate change exercise' should be moved away from KBAM module exercise. Yes, look at the words meaning, 'climate change' indeed have no linkage with KBAM.
In the real world, we are interested in asset management, because it is about money, money is about position, position is about control, control is about happy....Yes, if we can control, we feel happy. But it is only a short time happy, because no one likes to be controlled. In other words, the purpose of money is to control, yet the result of controlling is to be resisted or overthrown. That is to say, the asset management eventually leads to a failure if ones do not realize its surroundings. Thus, knowledge-based asset management approach is not enough, we need climate change exercise.
One reason is about the awareness of variation. The economic climate is changed so fast, at the same time it never changed. The variation of economic climate is the similar principle with the variation of cloud. It is hard for us to control the cloud, thus we face and accept so fast weather changes. However, no matter how to change, its manifestations are wind, rain, thunder, snow, etc. It is the similar principle in economic climate. So that is why we say that economic climate is changed so fast as well as never change.
Another reason is about environment management. The environment around us is becoming worse nowadays, human beings realized this 'risk', but the worse situation still cannot be stopped. Similarly, asset management will bring with final 'failure' if we igore the environment (economic enviroment & climate enviroment) changes.
Actually, ecomomic environment and climate environment interact with one another. That's why we need climate change exercise in KBAM. This is not a knowledge learning, it is a awareness learning.