March 29, 2012

…stupid inequality



One of my friend is working in a global orgainization, meaning that people under one department are located in several cities (in this case, Bangkok, Budapest and Curitiba).
A while ago, each location was given a budget, equally in amount, to organize team-building activitiy.
My friend was appointed into the team-building committee, organizing a two day and one night trip to the beach near by, staying at a decent 3 stars hotel instead of having everything done in one day as it used to be.

However, the proposal was not approved by the big boss. As she was told, the reason behind the rejection was because in the same budget, the colleagues in Hungary and Brazil were not able to pull off an overnight team-building.
Thus, Bangkok employees were only allowed to have a one-day teambuilding activity.

Did the boss show a good quality of leadership by not approving Bangkok employees from having an overnight event in order not to create any inequal feelings to the employees based in another two locations?

To me, he (the boss) limited the employee's good initiatives; when his subsidiaries were able to come up with something creatives, out of the box and likely to promote the team unity (amoung Bangkok employees), I don't think using the term 'creating unequal working atmosphere' is really applicable under this circumstance.

Yes, my friend went berserk over the decision....lol


- 2 comments by 2 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. In my opinion the ‘no GO’ decision was bad. First of all, why would employees from other cities object to what other teams are doing? All of them had the same amount of money and were ‘free’ to do what they wanted. Other teams should not have anything to say about decisions of other teams!
    Second of all, if they wanted to make it so equal, the big boss should have prepared the same activity and tell teams to ogranise the same day, different places – just rubbish!

    30 Mar 2012, 15:48

  2. Ungsutorn Thavornlertrat

    ...yes,...

    Eventhough that decision was made in attempt to keep employees outside Thailand happy, but how would that make employees in Bangkok feel?

    I’m sure being a leader, you need to be very understanding and have a smart way to compromise the situation.

    in this situation, ppl are demotivated and feel inequality….darn!

    30 Mar 2012, 16:15


Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

March 2012

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Feb |  Today  | Apr
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31   

Search this blog

Tags

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • in this case, it is the weakness in Thai labour law, even if it is there to protect employees, the g… by Ungsutorn Thavornlertrat on this entry
  • http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/ftmsc/modules/modulelist/kbam/seminars/outcomes/seminar_6/ a s… by Pinthida Thanatipanont on this entry
  • This is a good example of KM, I agree. However, this situation will not happen most of the time only… by Majdi Bdewi on this entry
  • Yep, it's like we don't really tell our work colleagues about what we do, who we are, or how we feel… by Pinthida Thanatipanont on this entry
  • yep thats true. it's happening in almost every top organizations in Thailand – as far as I am concer… by Pinthida Thanatipanont on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXIX