All entries for Monday 04 February 2013

February 04, 2013

Thinking about assessment

Assessment remains a hot topic for debate and development and here I’ve included links to a recent article from the Guardian and publication from the HEA that made me stop and think. So here are just a few of my thoughts…

University degrees: our arcane system of firsts, seconds and thirds (Guardian, January 2013)

This is an interesting piece from the Guardian that raises the issue of norm or criterion referenced assessment. Should be given to students for achievement in relation to their peers or against a set of given criteria.

I am of the opinion that it should be the latter, believing that students shouldn’t miss out on getting a first because the group as the whole is achieving higher grades. Imagine how upset you’d be to find out if you’d just delayed your entry to University by a year that you’d have got a first because your mark would have put you in the top x per cent, but this year you’re going to miss out.

I can see the benefits of norm referenced assessment if all prospective employees were being drawn from the same cohort of students (same year, same course, same University) but surely as soon as you move beyond this group then norm referenced is, well no longer norm referenced? I’d be interested to hear more from others about the potential merits of this system – am I missing something?

A Marked Improvement (HEA, October 2012)

There are two key points I wanted to highlight from this document..

Firstly one of the tenets highlights that assessment for learning is key: assessment should be about supporting students to achieve high standards of learning. Assessment needs to provide a space for students to demonstrate their learning and support them to improve.

  • Surely this suggests that more students achieving a 2:1 (reported in the Guardian article) is a sign that we’re improving our assessment for learning rather than a cause for concern?

Secondly the tenets suggest that assessment takes place within a community of practice and students and staff work together to construct an understanding of the standards. Dialogue within this community can help to ensure that assessment is an integral part of any course and support students to develop their own understanding of the standards to which they aspire. In addition assessment relies on staff making professional judgements which can’t always be articulated and it’s this professional judgement that provides room for students to excel beyond our expectations.

  • To what extent do we make space for this dialogue to take place when introducing assessment to students?

Re-blogged from

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

February 2013

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Jan |  Today  | Mar
            1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28         

Search this blog


Most recent comments

  • Thanks for highlighting this Sarah. by Steve Locke-Wheaton on this entry
  • As one of the judges for last year's competition (and for this year's), I have to echo David's comme… by Sarah Richardson on this entry
  • Yes Sarah, I have also seen many favourable student comments for audio feedback and my own work on v… by Teresa MacKinnon on this entry
  • Thanks, Sarah, for your comment and for flagging up the Leeds case study. It seems to reveal the dep… by on this entry
  • Hot off the press is a case study on digital feedback tutorials from the University of Leeds: http:/… by Sarah Richardson on this entry

Blog archive

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder