## May 26, 2006

Am I the only one who considers some questions in exams worthy the phrase ‘to kill for’?? You know those questions you can actually answer!! Why is it that they only appear in past exams, and usually last year’s as well so that there is absolutely no chance of them appearing this year??

Why is it that the only topics I consider not worthwhile to revise, because they have never appeared in the past, always show up in the compulsory part of the exam?? Using this logic I’d say that the topics that will turn up in my exam tomorrow will be on auditing, cash flow statements and probably activity based costing. There won’t be anything on absorption costing or ratio analysis now that I have learnt all the 17 equations by heart and know how to apply them.

On a good note though, I have realised that the maths and stats department have a sort of reward scheme. Meaning if you overload on your CATS, which I have done, you can in theory get a 2 (1) without actually performing to a 2 (1) standard. So you see for me to get a 2 (1), as an example, I only in fact need to get an average of 57.3% in my exams. Similarly for me to get a first I only need 66.8%. So it really pays off to do fuck–loads (obviously up to a point) and overload your CATS. It makes me happy, although it was pointed out to me that I should always aim to get a 100%, which I’d say is relatively impossible but none the less I get the point.
So yes, this little 'reward scheme' is why people in the past have got more than 100% as calculated using the Seymour Formula in their exams, sadly not me though.
Anyway, enough of geekyness. Exam tomorrow (eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek!!!!!!!!), have to continue with my revision. (And yes I know that one can say that blogging is not geeky whereas revision is…)

### 3 comments by 1 or more people

1. your teeth looked dazzling white last night malin, and your shoes were lovely

28 May 2006, 20:56

2. #### Alex

Yeah, I hope you're right; I opted or a 150 CAT workload next year – with the idea that I can drop. But who knows, perhaps the extra marks could work in my favour! But until next year – party!!

BTW congrats on becoming the SwedSoc mascot!

09 Jun 2006, 03:04

3. Oh dear Malin, you can't even beat Trinidad and Tobago!!!! Looks like all bets are off on Sweden!!!! :S

11 Jun 2006, 14:51

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

## May 2006

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Apr |  Today  | Jun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31

## Galleries

• Everyone would surely feel respective fear when in front of an Orca, but you seem to be really afrai… by Stranger on this entry
• I have had dreams of a whale trying 2 eat me 2 I am 2 scared 2 go in water now. Where and when are k… by 1 freaked out person on this entry
• I believe that killer whales are gentle mamals. just as humans they will have a fit if they are both… by malaysia on this entry
• I am really scared of killer whales. I dont know why as i have never seen one in my life, but even l… by Louise on this entry
• HI, IS THERE ANY CHANCE YOU COULD EMAIL ME THE ASSIGNMENT ON PROSTITUTION BECAUSE I AM DOING ONE TOO… by TAZ on this entry