September 22, 2008

Nokia E71

Writing about web page

My latest trial device from Nokia is the E71. This is one of their “enterprise” range, intended for business use. Consequently it has Exchange email support, office apps and other things your average business user would need from a mobile device. Given how I use mobile devices, and the things I was looking for in a PDA when I was looking a while ago it should be a good fit. Except of course I’ve now got a new mobile device. I’m afraid I’ve been “spoiled” by the iPhone, and while I would have written lots of complimentary things about the E71 3 months ago, now I just can’t. Sorry Nokia.

Physically the E71 is just a shade smaller in every dimension than the iPhone, and a little lighter, but there isn’t really a lot in it. The other obvious differences are that the nokia has a screen half the size and uses the space for a physical keyboard. Both have 3G, WiFi and Bluetooth, although the nokia does BT properly including the ability to use the phone as a modem. Both are nice to hold but the nokia feels more solid and robust through being a mostly metal case. And it does look nice. Nicer than the iPhone, even.

In use I was expecting to hate the Nokia’s keyboard because the keys are very small. In fact it works quite well. There’s enough key travel to give positive feedback and they are shaped well enough to help avoid mis-keying. There are some characters missing from the keyboard though, some of them quite irritating. Plus, it doesn’t have the same auto-correct feature that the iPhone keyboard does and I’ve got so used to that that I miss it. Typing is slower on the nokia as a result. Neither are great devices for mass text entry but the iPhone is marginally better.

The support for Exchanges works well enough. Pointing it at our Exchange server quickly populated the phone with contacts, calendar entries and emails. It even has a concept of “peak” and “off peak”, so you can keep up to date in real time while at work but shut it off (or slow it to a trickle) at home. I’d love the iPhone to have that. Also, the big button in the centre of the scroll pad has a nice, subtle heartbeat when there are unread messages. No need to unlock the phone to see if there are things to attend to. A really nice usability touch. Apple take note!

From here, though, things go downhill a bit. The Nokia’s screen just isn’t big enough. A few months ago I was giving serious consideration to getting an N82, and the E71’s screen is better than that, but after having used the iPhone there’s no going back. And it isn’t a touch screen. That is just so infuriating! The number of times I had to stop myself from stabbing my finger at the screen to press a button, or flicking the screen to scroll. And at the Nokia Open Lab, I wasn’t the only one. Again, once you’ve used a touch screen, anything less is just annoying. I even find myself wanting to do it to my laptop, so the E71 is in good company.

Those are my major comments, really. I have thoughts on lots of the details of the device, but for me the small screen and lack of touch makes the device uninteresting. It is a bit of a cliché, and probably lots of people disagree, but I think the iPhone has changed the game a little.

- 4 comments by 2 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. Steve Lawson

    Yup, I think the iPhone has definitely changed the game. I’ve yet to blog about the E71, largely because it ticks so few of the boxes for the kind of device I’d find useful that a blog post is almost reduntant. It’d be like me reviewing baby clothes – have neither a baby nor a severe genetic growth defect, and thus have no need of – nor knowledge of the need of – baby clothes. The E71’s camera is rudimentary, I can’t stand mini-qwerty keyboards and so it ends up having neither the sexy interface of the iPhone, nor the multi-media magical goodness of the N95

    I wonder what Nokia will do next… From what I gather, touch screen is a tricky area as Apple now have a whole raft of patents on the cool stuff…

    22 Sep 2008, 14:29

  2. John Dale

    You’re absolutely right, I think, about screen size. It’s incredibly hard to go back from the 480×320 of the iPhone to the 320×240 of the E71. It’s not that the E71 screen is bad, or poorly used; indeed Nokia have worked hard to deliver content as efficiently as possible in the space, and Opera Mini & Google Maps absolutely use the pixels to their best advantage. But you just can’t get around the fact that it’s only half as many pixels.

    I wonder whether there will be more 320×320 screens like on the new Palm Treo Pro emerging. You could see an E71 successor with a centimetre more vertical screen and a 320×320 display, I think. But perhaps by the time that happens, Apple will have moved on to the new 3.8” 800×480 screens of the sort that the new HTC Touch HD is now using!

    22 Sep 2008, 15:46

  3. Steve Rumsby

    I’ve used an 800×480 screen on the Nokia N810 I had a while ago and to be honest I’d rather have the iPhone screen. I guess that’s because Apple make better use of the fewer pixels they have? In which case give them an 800×480 screen and I guess the results will be so much better. Or maybe you really can’t make that much use of the extra pixels? You can only make stuff so small before you can’t see it any more.

    As for the Apple touch patents, are the important ones the multi-touch ones? There are other devices out there with single-touch screens, and that alone would make a huge difference. Maybe the flick-scrolling gestures are patented, though? Being able to use the iPhone without having to reach for a stylus is a big, big plus for me. If Apple have that tied up in patents, other phone manufacturers are in trouble for a while, I suspect…

    22 Sep 2008, 16:21

  4. prestige car hire

    the HTC Touch screen can be a pain to use on occasions.

    25 Dec 2008, 13:34

Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

Search this blog


Blog archive




Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder