All entries for Tuesday 29 November 2005
November 29, 2005
I think today I, if not realized, but became closer to the understanding why the leadership is so important. To my mind, the reason why there is a need for leadership is that this secret ingredient involves employees in the company’s life. This involvement may be very different: intelligent, emotional etc. It even includes passion if you wish. Without this involvement we are not able to reach the excellence. I think many EFQM tools imply at least formal employees’ involvement, but the leader is the person who is able to make all these tools really powerful and vivid.
As far as I understand (correct me if I am wrong), management tends to talk about motivation. I think it is a noticeable difference.
Another interesting thing that really appeals to me is how to build this involvement. The policy deployment approaches could be really useful in this sense. I feel that Hoshin Kanri is more efficient, than the Balanced Scorecard that seems as a more rough tool.
I have been thinking about the sessions we are having this week. We decide by ourselves what topics, related to the module structure, we would like to discuss. We discuss only the things we are really interested in. This is a huge advantage of this approach. Moreover, it worked perfectly well for me at the first module – PPE.
However, during this module I started to think that, probably, this approach has some drawbacks. First of all, it has become clear that having chosen the topic we tend to discuss it using our previous knowledge, our common sense, but not the knowledge specifically gained for this particular discussion. But we are not the only one who has tried to understand it since the beginning of the Earth. We have to understand there are lots of things that have been done in every area, including the areas we chose to discuss. Relying only on our own common sense, knowledge and experience we limit ourselves and limit very shortly.
Paul provides us with the absolutely necessary academic input, but I feel that is not enough. Ideally we all have to do some readings and researches before going to these seminars, but it is quite far from the reality. A bit more realistic approach is that the people who are interested in the topic they proposed should prepare some additional material to it. I feel that the discussion should be after some people present a brief review of what have been done in this area before we decided to discuss it. As an alternative way we may try to invite someone who is an expert in this field. However, it requires pre-planning and more difficult to implement.
I feel that this way (with some preparation) could be more efficient that the current one. It became especially clear for me today, when we were discussing Hoshin Kanri and after 2 presentations Paul described his view supported by his practical experience. That was an open-minded event for me!
I tried to understand why I have changed my mind about this type of learning. The reason, as I think, is that at the very beginning it was a great way to initiate thinking, it was a really good start, but by now we have moved several steps forward and there is a need for a bit more focused and intensive approach.
However, it is only my feelings about it and if for everyone else it still works perfectly, I am ready to follow.