All entries for September 2008

September 19, 2008

Financial Limericks

Just a bit of fun… they didn’t take me long and it probably shows!

Right now an old merchant banker
Might be viewed by some with some rancour
But if you give him some money
He might see it as funny
and spend it on another oil tanker

There was a man and his hedge fund
walking the streets looking quite stunned
He said, “have you got any cash?
cos of in the event of a crash
I’ll be sure to offer a refund!”

There was a wizard of finance
Who led the taxman a right dance
He said “With this government bond,
I’ll just wave my wand
But I’ll need an annuity in advance!”

Two banks talked about a possible merge
after feeling a definite urge.
“At the end”, said some top guys
“after all of the goodbyes,
We’ll have a bit left for a splurge”

A share dealer couldn’t shift some stock
Everyone thought it an old crock
They said “You should sell at a loss
Just like your old boss
Though they’re changing his office door lock…”

Some men tracking the FTSE 100
began to wonder if somehow they’d blundered…
They thought of their pension,
but didn’t dare mention
the others they’d probably plundered

There once was a stock market slump
that made everyone a bit of a grump
it turned into a recession
and brought on general depression
and we landed with a bit of a bump

The scene on the trading room floor
was normally something like war
but now it’s not “buy!”
it’s more like “goodbye!”
like nothing ever seen there before!


September 01, 2008

Why is the West annoying the Russians so much?

I’m not quite sure what the long term policies of the West are right now as regards Russia. Historically, there has been an effort to play one of the communist super powers off against the other but, right now, the West seems emboldened into poking the Russian bear almost for the hell of it.

The emerging Central European democracies have been desperate to make friends with the West, joining up to NATO and the EU, so that the West has pushed into what the Russians would have historically seen as their buffer zone against Western imperialism. In fact, the ongoing encirclement of Russia has reached proportions that Truman and Eisenhower could only have dreamed about. It has almost been the case that drawing the ex-Soviet client countries into the Western sphere has been seen as the spoils of the Cold War, as though it is the end of history…

It is hardly surprising that the Russians looked for an opportunity to draw a line to this ongoing erosion of their sphere of influence and were gifted one by the Georgian leader who (I can only surmise did it for reasons of domestic politics) decided he needed to stamp Georgian authority over the Ossetian region believing that enjoying American support (following use of military facilities in the country for the latter’s War on Terror) gave him protection against Russia but leaving Russia with an excuse to invade. On the one hand, the Russians have the restless North Ossetian region to consider so need to look strong on their internal political stage but there is also the larger Great Power stage to consider.

Ten years ago, the Neo-Cons in the US wrote a book called the Project for the New American Century in which they hypothesised that the best way to intimidate a tiger in its cage was to use a stick to prod at it until it retreats into the far corner of its cage. Is this the Neo-Con approach at work, being used against the Russians to put them back in their place? Of course, the downside of poking a stick at a tiger is that sooner or later it gets really really annoyed and tries to bite back.

And then there is David Milliband. He has been going around trying to recruit various countries into a coalition to stand against Russia. When the US did it a few years ago before invading Iraq, they were a strong country looking to acquire friends before they bullied a weak country. David Milliband seems to have decided that the UK, a medium sized enterprise, should try for a coalition against a fairly strong country…

I am pretty sure that countries these days will not go marching off to war like they did in 1914 where one small incident in the Balkans set it all off, but it would be a terrible thing if NATO and the US commit to defending so many countries that they become hopelessly overstretched, and able to defend nothing. On the other hand, the West cannot commit to come to the aid of other countries then not lift a finger when these countries are attacked.

So what exactly is the West up to in its dealings with Russia?


September 2008

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Aug |  Today  | Oct
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30               

Search this blog

Tags

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • Really this is surprising to know about BT where BT owes me a lot of money, about £150. This came th… by Sky Contact Details on this entry
  • The use of front fog lamps for the purpose of looking cool is negated by the fact that they are only… by martin Lamprecht on this entry
  • People are different & have different tolerances to light ingest. The fact that it is illegal is a s… by Gaz on this entry
  • However anyone wants to slice it, the fact of the matter is this. Sam's real life was in 2006. Loads… by Luca on this entry
  • Still, having those temp' unmaned traffic lights, or the 'lolly pop' hand held sign, that say; ''STO… by John on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXXI