February 16, 2009

Union elections fb group

I really should be doing some work but I am not.

If we assume that facebook is everything (not an unreasonable assumption) then it can accurately predict the election results.

So here are the number of people in the fb groups of the candidates for President (and the number of people invited) at around 16:15 on Monday week 7 (day 1).


  1. Mitchell Fung: 215, 1614
  2. Andrew Bradley: 147, 859
  3. Sam Shirley: 106, 876
  4. Asen Geshakov: 70, 206
  5. Andy Glyde: 58, 441


By far Mitchell is the big winner.

I can't be asked to do it for the other positions.

UPDATE: previously I did not find Bradley's group. This has now been corrected.



: 16 Feb 2009 16:19 |  Tags:   |  Comments (1) |  Report a problem

- One comment Not publicly viewable

  1. And there I was trying to work out how FB had descended to the depths of over 50,000 people per candidate were in the group… :(

    16 Feb 2009, 18:08

Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

February 2009

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Jan |  Today  | Mar
                  1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28   

Search this blog

Tags

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • Nice article, i'm not sure i'd fancy being the libertarian candidate at a student politics meeting. … by alfie on this entry
  • And there I was trying to work out how FB had descended to the depths of over 50,000 people per cand… by on this entry
  • What does everybody think? I personally think that it sounds like a totalitarian nightmare, but I c… by on this entry
  • I don't know but I'm trying to work out why "filthy paki" sounds worse than "filthy brit". There mus… by Sue on this entry
  • Another thing has sprung to mind when thinking about this subject. Recently, I took an NVQ, which wa… by Sue on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXXIII