one two [verification] step
Writing about web page /adriennecooper/entry/i_been_workin/
Writing about an entry you don't have permission to view
…thus, for a verificationist, there are two very different kinds of thought which one can have about an object: those for whcih a one–step verification procedure is appropriate, and those for which a two–step verification procedure is appropriate…
ONE: in the case of demonstrative thoughts, the subject's knowledge of what is in question will consist simply in his diposition to regard certain events, whose occurrence he is immediately in a position to recognise, as decisive of the truth or falsity of the thought.
TWO: On the other hand, when the subject is not in a deciding position vis–a–vis an object, his knowledge of what is in quesiton when he entrentains the thought that a is F will consist partly in his capacity to recognise, when confronted (in a deciding position) with an object, that it is a. Hence a two stage verification procedure will be appropriate: one stage would issue in the judgement 'this is a', and the other stage would issue in the judgement 'this is F.'
CONCLUSION: let me see you one two verification step, i love it when you one two verification step.
meanwhile, life goes on as philosophy pages me
i agree with joni, that while wine leaves me floored in a trailer park, i could drink a case of you