So Dan Brown is being sued for copying from these two guys who wrote a book ages ago? That right? Now, I'm no lawyer or historian, but surely by suggesting that he stole their idea they are also suggesting that they made it up in the first place?? I haven't read their book, but I presume it tries to persuade that the whole Jesus and Mary Magdalene sex scandal is 'fact'. In which case they can't own the idea can they? Isn't that a bit like a scientist saying, "I did this research but u can't write about it even if u reference me (which Brown does in his book)?".......i'm sure i must have missed the point….
Actually, neither are claiming that the ludicrous statements made in the books concerning Jesus are true – that's the point.
13 Mar 2006, 19:30
Add a comment
You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.