All entries for Monday 01 May 2006
May 01, 2006
Writing about web page http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4961532.stm
OK, it's yet another IPPR think piece and it's not exactly the first time round the block with this one.
And it does seem a little extreme: basically it amounts to an admission of failure – so many people have become disengaged from the political process and show no signs of rejoining, therefore we are going to force you to vote!
Having said that, I think that it is worth a punt.
What I find difficult to work out though is how big the penalty should be for NOT voting? Death? Tar and feathers? Sitting in the Countdown audience?
Er, not quite.
It is a breeze to canter through though – couple of hours will be all you'll need. And it is actually pretty amusing in places. And Levitt is clearly a sharp chap. There is also much to give you pause for thought and a reminder about why conventional wisdom is, well, conventional. So, a few sacred cows get slaughtered and he's a bit controversial, but what does it all add up to – breakthrough iconoclastic visionary stuff or just a bit clever clever?
He covers some great stuff and with some clever juxtapositions which do make you pause:
- the nature of incentives and why estate agents and sumo wrestlers cheat
- an explanation of the economic hierarchy of drug dealing – explaining why those at the bottom of the pile just don't make enough money and therefore have to live with their mums (a really insightful bit this I think)
- a controversial claim that the decline in crime rates in the USA in the late 90s is actually due to the outcome of Roe v Wade in the early 70s, ie legal abortion led to fewer potential criminals being born, rather than any other action by the police or government
- why what parents do matters less than what they are and why swimming pools are more dangerous than guns (a real highlight this)
- an entertaining dissection of naming choices of children in California (including a claim that one child was actually named 'Shithead', although it was pronounced differently).
But, all in all, pretty amusing and diverting reading. Recommended, but difficult to see it as more than diversionary scribblings.