All entries for Sunday 13 February 2005

February 13, 2005

Random Musings on SSM assignment

Right, I've just been looking at other people's NMOR folders (and even in one case an MNOR folder) and nobody's written anything in them. So I thought I'd be the first.

I'm trying to do this SSM assignment but, like most people it appears, I'm not really sure what I'm doing. The Factory Manager (who fails to appear on the Organisation Chart) wants us to provide him with a report 'making argued recommendations on how to proceed'. Apparently the inspection is unsatisfactory because the number of complaints too high, which costs them time, effort and money.

This raises two points straight away: firstly, are we just allowed to fiddle with inspections, or the whole factory? Let's presume we can fiddle with the whole set-up as we seem to have very little useful information about the present inspection practices. Secondly, are complaints really costing them that badly? The company performance chart show roughly a 50% rise in the numbers of complaints over the last two years, yet the cost remains the same. The money going into complaints is less than a tenth of the money going into inspections, so any improvements in inspections must be very sparing on the extra cash needed. However, you look at the volume of production over the past two years, then it's been dropping off increasingly rapidly. It looks like the complaints are costing them business! Combine this with the fact that the prices per unit of raw materials have been increasing every year and we can see their profits are dropping rapidly. In fact their pre-Tax profits are only half of what they were four years before!

If we look at the breakdown of complaints, then clearly the major problem area is 'Faults overlooked by inspection' (64%!). The next highest one is 'Failure to achieve effect while meeting spec.' at 20%. This is rather worrying. It's also a little confusing as to whose fault it is – are we grading things wrongly or do we just have retards for clients who don't actually know what they want? Let's presume that it's our fault. After all, the customer's always right. This means that our specifications are wrong, and it's the responsibility of the Specification Committee to set them.

One more thing I'm going to mention before I go to bed is that it states on page 2 of the assignment that 'the inspection organisation is independent of the Technical Services Department and Production Department in order to eliminate bias'. However, looking at Organisation Chart 1, both the Chief Inspector and the Production Department answer to the Works Manager, and the Laboratories who do the actual testing are directly subordinate to the Production Department, while the Technical Services Department is further removed from the Inspectors. The Technical Services Department are supposed to be dominant on the Specifications Committee, so the Inspectors apparent ties with the Production Department may be causing problems for them, in the way of conflicting interests.

Anyway, these are just some things I've thought about concerning the assignment. I'm a little worried about the usefulness of the stuff I've written as I haven't used SSM anywhere, which according to the marking criteria wouldn't even qualify me for a mark in the 40–49% range. Feel free to comment as you wish, I'm off to bed as I'm supposed to having a Valentine's meal with my girlfriend and she'd probably appreciate it if I was awake for it.

I: Tired Nick —> T: Sleep —> O: Rested Nick
W: Sleep helps me rest

February 2005

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Jan |  Today  |
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Search this blog



Most recent comments

  • im currently where you were when you posted last night, only its 11pm monday night, fortunately (now… by ivan on this entry
  • Thanks for this. I'm think I'm gradually getting to grips with what it is we're doing. I'm going bac… by on this entry
  • Hi, Don't know why you're worried sounds like a good place to start from to me – so what would a 'sp… by on this entry

Blog archive

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder