All 1 entries tagged Intersection
No other Warwick Blogs use the tag Intersection on entries | View entries tagged Intersection at Technorati | There are no images tagged Intersection on this blog
February 11, 2008
Raytracing: Intersection with a sphere
Follow-up to Raytracing: Intersection with a plane from Nick's blog
Last time I went through intersection of a ray with a plane. Plane’s are all well and good, but you can’t have a ray tracer without spheres everywhere :-)
This article’s another maths-heavy one I’m afraid – more vectors and dot products, this time with a quadratic equation thrown in at the end. Enjoy.
Equation for our ray:
(P is the position, O is the origin of the ray, D is the direction of the ray, t is the parametric variable)
Equation for a sphere:
(x, y and z represent points around the surface of the sphere, C is the centre of the sphere, r is the radius of the sphere)
As with the plane intersection in the previous article, we solve the equations simultaneously, setting P = (x,y,z).
First we’ll rewrite the sphere equation in vector form. Summing the squares of the x, y and z components is the same as the dot product.
Now substitute in the equation for our ray:
We’re trying to solve for t, so let’s break up the above equation using the distributivity of the dot product:
Now extract the Dt terms:
Collect like terms:
Now if we take the scalar t outside of the dot products, and move the r squared to the left hand side we get:
Which we can solve using the quadratic formulaWhere
This is where I notice that I’ve reused “C” as a variable name – don’t get confused between “C” for centre” and the “c” in the quadratic formula.
Here I’ve also simplified A and C. A is always 1 in this case, as the direction of our ray “D” is normalised. I’ve also combined C into a single dot product.
Here’s the quadratic formula, which we can simplify by removing the “a” multiplicand.
The rest is just a case of plugging in your values.
In order to solve this, you should check the value of the determinant (the bit inside the square root). If it’s < 0 then we have no real solutions, and therefore no intersections.
If the determinant is >= 0, then you need to check both solutions to the equation(-b + ... and -b – ...). We want the closest (lowest value) positive solution. A -ve value means the intersection is behind the ray. Also, if you have one +ve and one -ve solution, then your ray has been cast from inside the sphere.
One final thing worth noting is that there are special methods used to compute quadratic solutions which help to reduce the effect of rounding errors.
Ok, well hope that makes sense. Let me know if you have any questions or comments. Next post will probably cover lighting, so you can actually get planes and spheres in colour!