All entries for Tuesday 20 October 2009

October 20, 2009

Some viewpoints of OL

From my research, McAdam has no summary of OL. Instead, he just says OL is a context with LO. Therefore, i doubt that if this summary really exists.

From Foild and Lyles in 1985, actually, there are many versions of  definition of OL and none of them are widely accepted by people. This is quite disappointing, but gives me a broader way to research. After reading papers from  McAdam, Foild and Lyles and some other authors, I finally can give a brief answer to the project

Commonality

People development and involvement
Management by processes and facts
Continuous learning, innovation and improvement
Leadership and constancy of purpose
Results orientation

Key Values

Continual learning
Using tacit knowledge and experience
Shared vision
Collaboration
Multi dimensional (strategic) goals
Permanent changes

Processes

Concreting experience;
Observing and reflecting the hypothesis
Testing in future action
Gaining new experiences
Creating and conducting consensus assessments
Finalising the feedbacks
Repeating learning

Behaviours

Agenda-setting
Training assessors
Observing
Matching outcomes and assumptions
Getting results
Restructuring
Clarifying
Routinising

How it Supports EFQM

Systematic problem solving
Experimenting with new approaches
Learning from one¡¯s experience
Learning from other experience
Transferring knowledge
People Management

•1. Fiol.M and Lyles. M. 1985. Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Oct., 1985), pp. 803-813. Published by: Academy of Management. Accessed at http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/258048.pdf. on Oct. 18
•2. McAdam. R. and Leonard. D. 2003. Impacting organizational learning: the training and experiences of quality award examiners and assessors. Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol. 27. No. 4 (2003), pp 16-21. Published by MCB UP Ltd. Accessed at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Art icles/0030270102.html. on Oct 16
•3. McAdam. R. Leitch.C. and Harrison.R. 1998. The links between organisational learning and total quality: a critical review. Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol. 22. No.2 (1998), pp 47-56. Published by MCB UP Ltd. Accessed at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Art icles/0030220201.html on Oct 16
•4. Withey. E. 2005. Guide Summary. Accessed at http://www.opm.gov/hcaaf_resource_center/assets/Lead_tool8.pdf on Oct 17
•5. Templeton. G, Schmidt. M and Taylor. S. 2009. Managing the diffusion of organizational learning behavior. Information Systems Frontiers. Vol. 11 ,  No. 2  (April 2009), pp: 189 ¡§C 200.   Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers. Accessed at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1553187 on Oct 15

October 2009

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
|  Today  | Nov
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31   

Search this blog

Tags

Favourite blogs

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • Hey all; I think that Outsourcing can be a powerful advantage and it is not size related. Both comme… by on this entry
  • I would like to add that outsourcing is needed at all times however it depends on the organization's… by on this entry
  • Can I put something in here as I really happy to discuss this point with you. Outsourcing is just ab… by on this entry
  • My daughter has taken this trait to the endth degree and I absolutely love her for it. As well as al… by Sue on this entry
  • I guess I thought it would be more women orientated. Another thing that cropped up was "traits that … by Sue on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…

Last.fm Chart

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXXI