Follow–up on Career planning
Workshop Tutor: Fiona Kent
Heres a summary of how I've been getting on with my action points
Unfortunately, the interview was postponed from April 11 to April 17. Therefore, I couldn't have updated you about how the telephone interview went.
As far as my second action point regarding the preparation for the interview is concerned, I decided not to leave anything to chance. I watched the videos with interviews that Charlie Cunningham recommended me. I found them really interesting, especially the interviewers' comments on applicant’s performance. I learnt quite a lot about the nature of such interviews.
I also googled information regarding the possible questions I might be asked at the interview. I found it helpful because I tried to reply to each of them on my own. With such preparation, I felt during the conversation more relaxed and confident. When you prepare the possible answers, it is easier not to slip into a trap.
For example, one question I was asked was which subject at Warwick I have enjoyed most so far and why. I responded, that business planning - an integrative project based on teamwork was a challenging experience. He asked me which role I played in the team and what I think my strength was. I described him my responsibilities and told him that I like to challenge - improve things - to question new ideas so as to make the most of them. He found an opportunity to ask me a tricky question - don't you think that such approach to brainstorming can be sometimes frustrating?
Well, to be honest, I was surprised by such question. Luckily, one of the question I googled was similar to this one, so I knew that I have to turn it into something positive. I said that when a person knows his or her strengths, it is necessary to know when it is appropriate to use them. So I agreed that it might be frustrating, but I also pointed out that I am driven by achievements and that I like getting things done. When being short of time, I consider - is it worth to challenge the idea? Do we have time for it? Are those 3% of improvement more valuable compared to the progress of the overall project?
I think, such answer was quite diplomatic and it does not show my strength as a weakness. Am I right?
To conclude, the whole interview lasted more than 30 minutes and I had a good feeling about the way the interview went. I was told that I was articulate and my responses were well structured and meaningful. So now I just have to expect the worst and hope for the best.
Thank you Fiona for reading the blog, I tried to meet all the action points I set during the workshop. So now I guess I am going to start writing the final entry for the whole Warwick Skills Portfolio.
Thank you again for following my posts and all the best!
Fiona Thurburn Huelin
Well done for all your preparation before the interview on Tuesday-and for your answer to the unexpected question that prompted you to think on your feet! Preparation is key, but responding spontaneously makes the experience more interesting for you and the interviewer and it shows what you would be like if you had to deal with something similar in the work place. I think you are right about your response-from your telling of what you said, it suggests you are able critically to assess a situation and behave accordingly. I hope the interview has a positive outcome-please do let me know whatever happens.
19 Apr 2012, 14:06
Add a commentYou are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.