All 3 entries tagged Virgil
View all 14 entries tagged Virgil on Warwick Blogs | View entries tagged Virgil at Technorati | There are no images tagged Virgil on this blog
January 25, 2006
So I didn't end up offering any detail of how yesterday progressed for me once I got home; it was late, I was hungry. My commitment to the Blog may not be as fervent as last week [truth be told, I have been clinging to the research in general by my fingernails since the weekend] but I refuse to cast it to one side once and for all.
My meeting with Carlo was decidedly brief. The situation of my supervision has been discussed between himself and Andrew, with the outcome that Andrew — as a confirmed Classicist — will be henceforth assuming official control of steering this thing. Carlo mentioned that he would be happy to offer advice as and when I ask for it [although obviously, he will be rather limited if he is to act as the internal marker for the final project]; for a start, he has offered to return to me the essay I left with him with a few references to Petrarch's vernacular poetry which he said sprung to mind as he read it. I told him that I would appreciate that, knowing little about that subject — since reading the relevant chapter's in Greene's The Light in Troy I think that I may have to reckon with it after all at some point in my study.
That was really the sum of our discussion. As I noted yesterday, I had been planning to carry my laptop on to campus with me and begin writing the Servius chapter, though as I went to pack it up I realised that I wouldn't be able to take with me any of the books that serve as necessary security blankets, if nothing else. Having begun writing today, I feel as though I may only need to take Patterson's Pastoral and Ideology [at a stretch] if I'm ever thinking about writing on-campus again. Much of what's useful is in online articles.
So, yes, I started writing. Managed the start of an introduction that is about 200 words, along with a further 100 in early footnotes [inexplicable, I know] — a soul-destroying total from some three hours' labour. Cobbled something together about the inseparability of Virgil and the commentaries in Petrarch's reading, based on the text of his manuscript. As I continue I will launch into what can be said about the Martini frontispiece — I'm optimistic the words will start to flow a little more easily then.
I had the library drag Pierre de Nolhac's Petrarque et l'Humanisme out of the store. In French, of course, but I have seen it footnoted in so many articles that I've read about Petrarch's Virgil that I thought I'd pick up a copy. With a big dictionary and a guide to grammar I can probably get an idea of what's being said; in a similar fashion, I spent an hour translating the first page of the Virgil chapter Giuseppe Billanovich's Petrarca e il Primo Umanesimo in the PGRR yesterday. Only forty more to go, then.
Discovered today that Charles Martindale will be holding a Research seminar at Warwick on the 16th of next month. Seeing as he is one of the country's senior Virgilianists and an authority on pastoral and on the reception of the Classics, it struck me as I was writing this afternoon that I may well be required to have quite a long talk with him about my research. Nervous.
Work tomorrow, but I would be surprised if study wasn't resumed on Friday.
January 18, 2006
A day of mediocre accomplishment, it pains me to say. Even though I've already waded through most of the useful bibliography that's available to me, I am pricked by a sense of my unreadiness to start writing. With the more detailed plan I have constructed this afternoon, it occurs that much of what goes in the second half of the chapter [still the problem half] is going to be taken from the essay I wrote last term and simply elaborated. Perhaps with what I have done and learned already, there will be no need to labour again as I did before. There is also, though, the difficulty of knowing exactly the scope of the chapter; what to include without infringing upon the two that will follow on the politics of the Carmen, and on Petrarch's theory of literature.
It may be most useful to begin and allow my ideas to develop as I do. My fears of smashing into a theoretical brick wall as I did with my last essay may prove to be unfounded, as the fact that I have three-quarters of a satisfactory plan should guarantee my completion of at least a few thousand word without too much difficulty. Once I have done what I know falls within the span of the chapter I might be free to leave it and write the others with which it could overlap; I will at least have a better idea of how long the second half of the chapter has to be, if nothing else.
Something to chew over, anyway, as I wile away the hours stocking printers and putting books back on the shelves tomorrow at the Learning Grid. I don't usually get anything in the way of work done on a Thursday, working until five.
What I actually accomplished today:
- Introduced to comparative adjectives in Greek.
- Ordered two periodicals on inter-library loan.
- Carried home a book by Robert Kaster, Guardians of Language, only to find that his chapter on Servius was also published as the journal article I read on JSTOR yesterday.
- Finished reading Kallendorf chapter on Petrarch, the Africa and the Aeneid.
January 17, 2006
Haven’t left the house yet today.
Spent most of the morning and afternoon reading and compiling my ideas on Servius. Having read everything I have [and have yet to read, or haven’t recently looked at] in parts of books and photocopies, I trawled through a few articles on JSTOR—notably a useful piece on biographical allegory in the Eclogues by Raymond Starr.
With that done, I scribbled down a summary of what I could skim off all that on paper before deciding to try to commit a plan to Microsoft Word. I have divided my chapter into a two-part essay with the “hidden question”: For what reasons and in what ways did the Servian commentary shape Petrarch’s reading of the Eclogues? It will focus initially on Servius’ importance and appeal to Petrarch before looking specifically at what of his influence can be deduced in the Carmen. I think I could probably make a decent job of the first half right now but the second will require more reading and pondering.
After that, I read about half of the Petrarch chapter in Kallendorf’s In Praise Of Aeneas
- will pick it up again tomorrow. Had to leave it halfway through because of this Greek translation that needed doing - turned out to be lengthier than I remembered, but now finished.
Trundling over to the Leamington Apollo this evening to collect my metrosexual stripes before seeing Buttcrack Mountain. I fear that all I’ve read today of pius Aeneas and his fortitude will do nothing to prevent me from whimpering like a scolded dog before the end credits roll.