April 30, 2005

Blogs and Trackbacks

In a recent post, Tom Coates of plasticbag.org questioned the utility of blog trackbacks, saying:

I think it's time we faced the fact that Trackback is dead. We should state up front – the aspirations behind Trackback were admirable. We should reassert that we understand that there is a very real need to find mechanisms to knit together the world of webloggers and to allow conversations across multiple weblogs to operate effectively. We must recognise that Trackback was one of the first and most important attempts to work in that area. But Nevertheless, we have to face the fact – Trackback is dead.

Bryan of Smart Mobs on the other hand says,

Personally, I've seen living and dead trackback. My research blog gets very useful, clean trackbacks. But a couple of others I've posted on have suffered from pornspambacks.

I donít know the mechanisms surrounding trackback spam (e.g. how specific blogs are targeted, the effectiveness of preventative measures, etc.) but they still remain a useful tool for tracking the spread of conversations. Following trackbacks allows one to sample a greater range of responses as well as highlighting blogs on similar issues which may otherwise escape notice. The only real alternative at the current time is to search for URLs manually via the likes of Blogpulse, Pubsub and Technorati. It's tedious and not a surefire way of ensuring everyone who references a link (and wants others to know) is highlighted.

Many of the blogs I read donít seem to have a problem. Perhaps itís limited to those which see particularly heavy traffic. Or maybe the blogs which appear Ďcleaní are so because the authors are religiously deleting spam. In any case, time is sure to provide an innovative solution to the problem, or weíll simply learn to live with it; just like email.

- 2 comments by 1 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. Overdo

    Certain platforms are more likely to receive comment / trackback spam because the submissions can be automated and there is no need to register to post. High traffic is just a bonus for spammers.

    03 May 2005, 09:46

  2. Fair enough. I've seen some sites which require entry of a code displayed in an image before a comment can be posted. I imagine that's a pretty good anti-spam measure. Wonder why it isn't widely adopted.

    03 May 2005, 12:35

Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

April 2005

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Mar |  Today  | May
            1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30   

Search this blog



Most recent comments

  • i like muff on toast by guildy on this entry
  • hairs :P by Peter hairs on this entry
  • Incest hairs by michael lumsden on this entry
  • incest thursday every day with mary!! by michael lumsden on this entry
  • I like maureen by Neil duncan on this entry

Blog archive

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder