Writing about web page http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8132968.stm
It appears that the current political debate in the UK on the future of the country’s finances has reached something of a stalemate. As political commentators, economists and those who follow politics in the news will know, Gordon Brown has resorted to outright and blatant lying in a last-ditch attempt to save his bacon. He’s widely on the record for portraying the next election as a clear choice between “Labour investment and Tory cuts”. I have yet to hear a single person outside the Labour party (who seem to have begrudingly united behind their leader after their disastrous European elections) express a view other than “this is a fabrication”. I even heard an economist on PM say (apologies if this is not exact) “For once, there is a very clear right and wrong, and all the government’s own figures show that Gordon Brown is wrong”. What I don’t understand is why there is widespread indifference to this at present. Perhaps everyone is exhausted in the wake of the economic crisis and the expenses scandal. But surely when the debate comes this far between one party telling the truth and the other a complete fabrication, then it’s really time to sit up and take action. I quote the linked article above:
Some in Labour feel it is not a credible position to say that the Tories are going to cut everything while Labour will invest. But cabinet ministers close to Gordon Brown believe that this is a fruitful line of attack.
How exactly cabinet ministers think that this is a credible line of attack, when the argument is clearly so far from being credible, I don’t know. Perhaps it is the only position that Labour have left, because as soon as they are forced to admit the true state of the finances and come clean they will be forced to show that their management of the economy not just since the credit crunch but before it was poor, which will do irrepairable damage to them. Mervin King has already said as much as the current levels of government spending are unsustainable – they have after all only been sustained so far by relying in turn on an unsustainable financial sector. Right now though, until Labour drop the pretence that investment will continue to rise under their governance if they are elected for a fourth term, the Conservatives will not be able to talk a great deal more about their plans for the economy, because discussion of cuts from them would result in Labour making political hay by falsely pointing the finger and claiming to have something altogether better. Nick Clegg is right when he says that neither of the two main parties is being honest with the public – but until Labour are forced into doing so, the Conservatives risk too much damage by revealing their future plans.
2 comments by 1 or more people
Aside, although along the lines of “lies” – I think it was Harriet Harman (although I’m probably wrong… It was a female minister or recently ex-minister) who was being interviewed after the local elections where Labour lost 4 councils and nearly 300 councillors (no other party actually lost any councillors) was asked:
“Would you see this as a demonstration that the British Public has lost faith in the Labour Party?”
Her unashamed reply, which might have left me gobsmacked if I had not been in an agile mood, was:
“No, I don’t think so at all. What it does demonstrate is…”
I can’t remember the rest because I was trying to avoid the smack of my gob, as I say. There comes a time, as you are right in piping up about, when we should shout “liar” until they shut the funk up and behave in a decent manner.
06 Jul 2009, 09:45
well! Its very similar to the tory lies where they pretend that if they were in power their banking cronies would somehow not have failed and kept our little island immune from the storm that is affecting all the countries in the world. Or what about the idea that the most socially explotative and capitalist party we have that might get into power are somehow all green and lefty and all about equality of opportunity? How about the idea that the expenses scandal is a labour government issue when in fact the biggest expenses rip offs were tories, or what about the one where the conservatives claim that Labour disassociated grants from education and introduced fees – when it was they whos set up the student loan model and set up legislation for fees in higher education, or what about the one where the tories claim to be the ‘greenest’ mainstream party – who also invest heavily in oil stock and take party donations from people running energy companies, or the one where Cameron claims to understand the ordinary bloke when he went to Eton or the idea that the Tories are the party of protest when they are clarly the party of conformity, or that they claim to be the most gay-friendly party yet allow homophobic comediens at party conferences or the .. do I really have to go on??
21 Jul 2009, 22:12
Add a commentYou are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.