All entries for September 2005

September 09, 2005

Warwick in Asia

Didn't see this mentioned on the blogs:


Warwick in Asia discussed in the Independent. Raised a few issues I hadn't realised about the project, notably who would want to teach or study there.

It also seems the University is set to approve the plan with no clear commitment from the Singapore government about how much money they will receive.

Is it not possible that the University has no idea how much it will cost the University of Warwick, and that it could potentially be paying for 50% + of the project?

Also, another key point. I see that 'concerns over human rights and academic freedom must be addressed' has been replaced as a cause of concern with:

Understanding of the compromises Warwick staff and students would face on issues of academic freedom and freedom of speech

Isn't this a bit of an about-turn on the part of those looking into the feasibility of the project?

What are they thinking (2)?

So last week I unveiled the delightful, new, pink buses.

Today I think I can confirm they're staying.

Having just bought my bus pass (and WOAH they've gone up in price!), I got a leaflet telling me how much I'd like to be deafened by the 'Party Bus' as Rachel calls it, with its FM Radio fixed on either Mercia or Radio 2 (gawd help us).

They seem to think they should be proud of the fact that "Everything's pink!", which is apparently a result of "Acting on your comments from last year".

Well which fools asked for a radio!? Because the speakers are only upstairs, meaning that the driver has them on full blast so he/she can hear the dulcet tones of Terry Wogan.

Impossible to get a minute's peace on the bus now, and a nightmare for anyone wanting to cram for a seminar they should have read for.

The timetable seems to have changed, so there's a bus every 12 minutes during the daytime (wasn't it every 10?) although there's more buses during the peak hours (0806, 0815, 0816, 0826, for example). Probably better than before, as long as they're reliable.

And then there's prices. Three terms this year will set you back £205, two terms £150 and one term £80. Also, these prices include insurance, meaning that if you lose your card (no more than twice) it'll be replaced. Don't buy the insurance (three terms = £190 otherwise) and you'll have to pay for a whole new card from scratch.

So hope you've all got some money left over from the holidays!

P.S. SAY NO TO WOGAN (or any other loud music on the buses – what's the point of an MP3 player otherwise)

The Guardian

So the Guardian unveils a brand new look (and size) on Monday when it relaunches in 'Berliner' – a mix of broadsheet and tabloid.

I think it's a good idea. The Independent and The Times, since going compact, have too often had only one big story splashed on the frontpage. It worked well as a gimmick, but because it sells better than when they do several stories, got overused.

But the design seems a less successful than the size. The title of the paper is perhaps too low down the page, and looks a bit too much like The Independent's styling.

But on the plus size, colour on every page means that black and white photos will be a thing of the past (unless chosen by the photographer), and probably more expensive advertising (which, you never know in the world of the media today, MIGHT be used for more journalists).

We'll have to see on Monday how it ends up looking, but generally I think it should be a change for the better.

September 05, 2005

Welcome back

Gotta love Warwick…

I'm writing to let you know that the first session for [module] will be on Monday 26 September 2005 Time 9am-11am.

Thankyou. Oh so much.

P.S. I know it's not their fault, but can't the first years be given the nine o'clocks? I mean, they can practically go to lectures in their dressing gowns and go back to bed after!

September 02, 2005

Bleeding us dry

At last, the much heralded launch of Warwick Sport.

But what's this?

£25 !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?

What exactly did I pay for Sports Federation Membership when I joined the Uni?

(Yes, it's £5 than cheaper than those that didn't originally join, but if you do one sport, the membership for that ONE sport is effectively £25)

I smell a classic Warwick rip-off, thanks to the University and their good friends the Union.

September 01, 2005

Hurricane Katrina: A Disastrous Response to a Natural Disaster

Whatever happened to this year’s silly season? Instead of stories about cats stuck in trees and people living to 115, we’ve had a summer of terrorism, politics and national disasters.

A ‘bad’ summer has just been worsened by the worst hurricane in living memory, with predictions of thousands dead and a million homeless and jobless. A story such as this would perhaps not shock us too much after similar-sounding scenes in war-torn Darfur, annual monsoon seasons and the Boxing Day tsunami in South-East Asia.

But Hurricane Katrina shocks more because it has happened in the Southern U.S. state of Louisiana, and to a lesser extent its neighbours. An American life is clearly – and perhaps in contradiction to the media’s treatment of the war in Iraq (notice the recent stampede that killed nearly 1,000, but gained relatively little reportage) – not worth more than those killed in the tsunami, or in other disasters occurring around the world. But because of the geography of this disaster, it jars more heavily: How has the situation got this bad in the world’s most powerful and resourceful nation?

Watching the pictures of refugees outside the Louisiana Superdome, it is unbelievable that such devastation of life has been allowed in one of the most industrialised nations in the world. Certainly, evacuations were announced two days before Katrina hit the mainland. But something clearly has gone wrong. A helicopter counting those stranded on rooftops gave up when they reached 10,000. And this is three days after the hurricane.

For a country proud of its ability to deal with emergencies (9/11, the San Andreas Fault and the regular hurricane season), Katrina has revealed major problems in the United States’ ability to cope with something on this scale. Today, President Bush said the level of devastation was worse than that suffered on 9/11. He is correct. While 9/11 affected a number of skyscrapers and extinguished the lives and livelihoods of thousands, Hurricane Katrina has caused the same devastation to an entire city with a population of around 1,200,000.

Questions which will be answered in the future include how will the U.S. economy deal with the overnight loss of over a million jobs? A presidency will be considered poor if over 8 years this many jobs are lost. But in one day? The effects on the economy may take some time to understand.

And then there is the eternal problem of oil. Half of the United States’ gasoline comes from the Gulf Coast, and much of it via Louisiana. One estimate suggested a gallon of oil may rise from $2.30 to $4.00, with a knock-on effect which will surely extend to Europe’s prices. In Louisiana, petrol prices have already risen to up to $6.00. Bush has warned that oil supplies across the country may become erratic.

Political questions will also have to be answered. The response to Katrina has been, it appears, shambolic. The poorest citizens of New Orleans – 80% of which is still under water – were those left behind, with no public transport to evacuate them to safe areas. Reports suggest someone committed suicide in the Superdome due to the horrific conditions in the most iconic shelter in the city.

Where, also, are the armed forces? ‘Iraq’, is one plausible suggestion. But it seems unbelievable that such large-scale looting is being permitted considering the military strength of the United States. And they should surely be there in numbers to rescue the 50,000+ who have been without food and water for 72 hours. Food aid, more typically seen in Africa, is urgently needed and is seemingly non-existent.

All this seems to boil down to a lack of preparedness and a shockingly poor response from the federal government. President Bush’s response has not matched the gravity of the situation. Let’s remember that thousands are likely to have died, and 0.5% of the country’s population has been made homeless. The refugees are being diverted to Texas, which Mr Bush supposes will rise to the challenge by opening its doors to disaffected people.

This reliance on people’s generosity is perhaps a little naïve, in a country which as Robert Putnam analysed in ‘Bowling Alone’ has a sense of society which is more dis-United than any other democracy’s. Where are the government refugee camps? It seems questionable whether 1,200,000 people can be accommodated in the homes of other Southern Americans, and those who will lose out will surely be those most in need.

Americans’ aversion to a welfare state may very likely extend to a reluctance to offer long-term help to a city which must rebuild itself from the ground-up. I’m afraid I rather expect a response along the lines of ‘it’s not my problem’.

The US seems willing to allow itself to divide by class just as well as the most corrupt African states: the poor and unfortunate will be those given the least help.

A large degree of environmental evidence suggests that New Orleans should not be rebuilt in its former state. Many feet below sea level, and beneath the level of the Mississippi River, it seems ill-conceived, and as one commentator pointed out today, was the result of trade being considered more important than environmental safety when the Pioneers founded it.

But the city must be rebuilt somewhere, in some form. Yes, the short term focus must be on rescuing the survivors whose lives are in immediate danger. This has been badly managed so far. Where will these survivors go once rescued? How will they become economically independent again?

For a country at the pinnacle of technological and – its ideological supporters would have us believe – cultural progress, the United States’ response to Hurricane Katrina has been appalling.

President Bush is, in mishandling the rescue operation and the long-term security of the people of New Orleans, slowly handing the 2008 Presidential election to the Democrats. Indeed, Mr Bush needs to quickly work towards the return of normality before his and his party’s reputation for handling disasters – let alone his legacy – is irreparably damaged.

But furthermore, fewer people will be looking at the USA and its people in awe tonight, which will greatly endanger the premise of the country’s foreign policy. For it is not just the lives of those in Louisiana which are being destroyed – the reputation of the United States of America is being compromised by its inability to deal compassionately with its own people.

Link: Wikipedia entry on Hurricane Katrina

Twitter Go to 'Twitter / chrisdoidge'

Tetbury Online

Most recent comments

  • To quote from PM Cameron's speech at Munich Security Conference on the failure of State Multicultura… by on this entry
  • Not sure whether their installation can do that (though I assume it will), but I personally have a D… by Pierre on this entry
  • Yup. The figure at the end I guess isn't so much a sign of falling standards, as failing policy. by on this entry
  • Didn't the compulsory GCSE in a language get ditched a few years back? by on this entry
  • Yeah, that was a Brown–like kiss of death. by on this entry

Search this blog

Blog archive



September 2005

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Aug |  Today  | Oct
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30      
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder