January 25, 2006

Education policy: the mysterious disappearance of two–party politics?

Tony Blair is probably having some mental issues at the moment. For 8 years, the Tories have acted like his worst enemy. And then suddenly, they're threatening to back him to the hilt over education reforms which a number of his backbench colleagues are opposed to.

So what's going on? Is this the end of two- or three-party politics? Very simply, no. Normal service will be resumed. But David Cameron is very happy embarrasing Mr Blair by showing him that his education policy is inherently Conservative.

Again, Labour's presentation of a major policy has been poor. Much of the government's opposition will come from backbenchers who were put off by the arrogant style of policy-making which Number 10 has adopted.

Charles Clarke today said that the education policy didn't need adjusting, because it was part of Labour's manifesto which got them elected. But didn't they get elected in spite of much of their manifesto? If you could only vote for a political party if you agreed with everything they said in their manifesto, then we would either have a plethora of parties to choose from, or very low turnout.

So David Cameron is playing a very clever game. By showing outright support for Labour's education policy, he is driving a larger wedge between Mr Blair and much of his own party (indeed, even his predecessor).

And while this might become a regular occurence if Dave thinks it works to his advantage, don't expect the parties to be quite so closely aligned when it comes to the 2009 election. The two parties do really have different policies, even if it serves Cameron to pretend otherwise – for now.

- 2 comments by 2 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. Christopher Rossdale

    Yeah, but when Blair ends up winning the reform vote because the Tories voting with him make up for the Labour rebellions, it could totally upset his premiership. Not sure what could happen, don't think it'll go as far as dislodging him quite yet, but that seems to be the way it's headed – will make for some interesting PMQs!

    26 Jan 2006, 00:48

  2. I think if the Tories hadn't supported the bill it would have been passed anyway, given the partisan nature of British politics I'm fairly confident that had the Tories opposed the bill they'd have jumped on board. Plus, a large majority of labour back benchers have this rather irritating tendency to lose their nerve the moment it looks like Blair might actually lose the bill, just like they did by choosing to support the hurried timetable for the bill's implementation even though they opposed the bill itself.

    23 Mar 2006, 00:33

Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

Twitter Go to 'Twitter / chrisdoidge'

Tetbury Online

Most recent comments

  • To quote from PM Cameron's speech at Munich Security Conference on the failure of State Multicultura… by on this entry
  • Not sure whether their installation can do that (though I assume it will), but I personally have a D… by Pierre on this entry
  • Yup. The figure at the end I guess isn't so much a sign of falling standards, as failing policy. by on this entry
  • Didn't the compulsory GCSE in a language get ditched a few years back? by on this entry
  • Yeah, that was a Brown–like kiss of death. by on this entry

Search this blog

Blog archive



January 2006

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Dec |  Today  | Feb
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31               
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder