All entries for Wednesday 28 January 2009
January 28, 2009
Writing about web page http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/27/AR2009012700457.html
This article in the Washington Post (signup required) might provide some rare good news for Gordon Brown.
The U.S. Treasury is planning to help America’s banks in much the same way as Gordon Brown has in the UK.
On the table are several approaches, which officials have begun to experiment with on a smaller scale. One would give the firms a federal guarantee protecting them against losses on assets that are backed by failing mortgages and other troubled loans. Another would set up new government institutions to buy these toxic assets. A third would inject more money into financial firms in exchange for ownership stakes, perhaps ending with nationalization in all but name.
Pretty much entirely the British plan then, and the piece also goes on to say how the whole project will rely on ‘trial and error’ and ‘a combination of initiatives’.
For the ‘Saviour of the World’ (© All Media Outlets) to be considering exactly what Gordon Brown has been often criticised for will surely give the PM something to smile about.
He might be under fire for having caused the problem, but if Obama’s economic team is in complete agreement about how to fix it, Gordon Brown might just come out of this with his head held high.
Either that or the UK and US are both doomed.
The Consultative Group on the Past of Northern Ireland is publishing its final report today.
Clearly the most contentious part of it will be the suggestion that victims of the Troubles’ families (both terrorists and those killed by terrorists) will be eligible to receive £12,000.
The co-Chair of the group is adamant this is not ‘compensation’.
This is ‘recognition’ of people’s loss, given in answer to people’s complaints that recognition is lacking.
But I can’t help thinking the Consultative Group has added two plus two and got five.
How many of those asking for ‘recognition’ specifically asked for money? I suspect the bureaucrats have completely misconstrued what they were asking for.
A quick glance at the Consultative Group’s website suggests many people are unhappy at the £12,000 idea and wanted recognition of another kind.