All entries for Tuesday 11 October 2005

October 11, 2005

Is plagiarism a problem?

Writing about web page http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/elearning/trends/funding/tqef/existingprojects/sciencescaa/

I got an encouragingly lively reception when I climbed Gibbet Hill on Friday afternoon (a walk I miss since Mathematics moved to Central Campus) to talk to the Biological Sciences Undergraduate Teaching Committee about CAA. The discussion ate 15 minutes or more into their precious meeting time but brought me some positive outcomes:

  • Two first-year modules were identified where CAA would help, and suitable materials already exist for one of them
  • CAA could play a useful role in the continuous assessment of several second-year modules
  • The departmental Chair, Professor Robert Freedman, did not entirely rule out the possibility of freeing up staff time to develop CAA resources

Two of the discussion points were:

  • The value of using paper-based data-capture methods for continuous assessment
  • The risks of plagiarism

I will discuss data capture in a separate blog but will make a couple of points here about the risks of cheating in computer-aided assessment when it is used in a 'summative' mode, that is to say, a mode where the assessment directly affects the outcome of a student's degree (for example, yielding marks for course credit or determining progression).

First some general points:

  • The level of security in exams only needs to be proportional to the weight of the assessment
  • A vanishingly small amount of course credit seems to get most learners engaged
  • Credit representing say 10% of a first-year module affects at worst the second decimal place in the final percentage used to determine a student's degree class
  • Students who cheat in continuous assessment shoot themselves in the foot; they are usually exposed in the final exam
  • No system of invigilation offers 100% security against cheating

Now a few practical suggestions for raising the level of security in computer-aided tests and exams used in summative mode:

  1. Generate many variations of each question type and permute them so that each student answers a different question paper; several assessment packages are good at this for numerical questions
  2. When a student logs on to a test, display his or her university card on the table and screen to make identity confirmation easy
  3. A couple of random visits by an invigilator to the computer room during a 50-minute exam is a good deterrent
  4. Install CCTV in computer suites used for assessment
  5. Disable access to other computer applications and directories while the exam is in progress if the style of the questions makes this necessary (to prevent students using, for example, the internet or some mathematical sofware to answer the questions)

Other suggestions please.


October 2005

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
|  Today  | Nov
               1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31                  

Search this blog

Tags

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • The LaTeX equations are a little wobbly in their baselines That's because they use mimeTeX. I am try… by Steve Mayer on this entry
  • Aha! You are right, John. I am familiar with a different terminology: Multiple Choice for what Quizb… by on this entry
  • Haven't you used the wrong question type, Trevor? Your answers look, to my unskilled eye, to be mutu… by John Dale on this entry
  • The usual factors in Information Assurance are: Confidentiality Integrity Availability And for syste… by Max Hammond on this entry
  • Is the workshop next Monday,26 March 07, open to anybody interested in computer aided assessment? If… by Kuldeep Singh on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXXI