October 22, 2013

The problem with targets…

After today's class, an interesting debate occured concerning targets and their use that has led to me developing the idea for this blog. It concerned the use of targets when measuring performance and/or acting as an incentive or goal for employees to reach. Essentially, the first criticism of targets was how to correctly predict them? Because if you are launching a new product, for example, it is almost impossible to accurately predict how many units you may sell. If the target is too low, employees may be demotivated once they have hit their target, and if the target is too high, employees may think they have no chance of reaching it, and may choose to miss the target by 100% as opposed to working hard, missing it by 5% and being in the same position of missing the target.

A good example of the shortcomings of targets could be highlighted by a sales worker. If they have hit their targets for the week, they may become complacent for the rest of the week. If for instance, someone phones them up asking to place an order, the sales person may defer the actual order until next week so it can contribute to their targets for that week, reducing sales for that working week and delaying the time the customer may receive the product. Furthermore, the use of targets, like performance related pay can increase competition within an organisation, which can in turn have an adverse effect on productivity, morale and the overall performance of employees within an organisation.

Therefore, there must be potentially alternative solutions to the use of targets that can still guide and help see whether an organisation is meeting expectations or not. As opposed to frequent targets (e.g. weekly), the use of either periodic targets or/and one flat annual target may help reduce some of the issues discussed above. However, the use of performance reviews of employees may be a better way of measuring employee's work and the organisation's output. This is because data is analysed concerning performance and variables may be understood rather than just offering a statistical insight into productivity with no information as to why targets were or were not met. Therefore, this and the use of key performance indicators is potentially a more suitable and useful measuring tool than just setting targets. More importantly, customer satisfaction feedback also offers more insightful and detailed information on not just whether targets are met, but whether the product or service offered is meeting or exceeding the customer's demands.

Therefore, I feel that the use of targets is not the most successful way of measuring results within an organisation.

- 2 comments by 2 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. Ana Anaya Santrich

    I agree, and I would say that performance review to replace target can be understand and lead it to a bad performance at the end if it is not implement correctly. This is because adapting it sometimes is used or see it as monitoring to punish them reducing quality when workers feel the pressure of supervisors looking what are they doing and how, when at the end nobody knows better their jobs as themselves, therefore explanation of rules and purpose are required as well as communication of strategies to understand objectives and feedbacks.

    26 Oct 2013, 23:32

  2. Benjamin Roberts

    I feel there needs to be some sort of review, and performance reviews and appraisals are one of the best way of doing this. Not to intimidate or punish employees if they fail to hit their targets, but to help understand how they work, see if the working processes could be improved and to offer them further training if there are not as efficient or competent as they could be. I feel there needs to be some sort of measurement of employees performance, otherwise some employees may begin to choose not to work as well as they could do. Furthermore, the organisation would not necessarily be as efficient as possible if they don’t understand how their employees are performing. Plus I feel that offering them further training and development will help make them feel a valued part of the organisation, increasing their satisfaction in the work environment.

    27 Oct 2013, 12:50

Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

October 2013

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
|  Today  | Nov
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31         

Search this blog



Most recent comments

  • I like your comment Mayo, I did try to listen and engage the people in my team, but what tended to h… by Benjamin Roberts on this entry
  • This is a very beautiful piece of blog ben and i am so glad i bumped into it. Its so sad that we all… by on this entry
  • Ben, thank you for initiating this thread. I feel that it is sad that some people have come to the e… by Paul Roberts on this entry
  • Thanks for you feedback though! I will consider how I work with people in the future and change how … by Benjamin Roberts on this entry
  • That's a valid point you raise and something I have been considering. I acted as the leader in the t… by Benjamin Roberts on this entry

Blog archive

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder