All entries for Sunday 13 February 2011

February 13, 2011

Participative VS Autocratic

some approaches to leadership seem to be judgemental. They are either black or white. They emphasis the benefits of personal participative  leadership and stress the weaknesses of positional leadership no mater what the situation is.

however, will the situation itself forces the people who believe in participative leadership to practise an autocratic leadership? for example, what happen if the time limits are critical ( the case of war for example)? will the officer make a vote among soldiers whether they should attack or not?

Another example, how would a manager behaves when they know that a building will collapse soon or a laboratory will explode? or what happened in the case of urgent financial decision? it is actually realted to saving situations or lifes.

is there cases when participative leaders were asked by their followers to behave autocratically? 

It is hard to judge an autocratic leadership unless we understand the leader (person) and the situation.



February 2011

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Jan |  Today  | Mar
   1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28                  

Search this blog

Tags

Galleries

Most recent comments

  • The sale man is indeed important for the organization in a short time. But he will impact on organiz… by on this entry
  • I think form a holistic picture is important. In the real life, we cannot igore the influence from k… by on this entry
  • If increasing information brings with technology development, whether knowledge management improves … by on this entry
  • nice discussion here, i think to minimize groupthink, leader should assign one person to act as devi… by on this entry
  • I think even effective leader cannot guarantee a groupthink free decision. an effective leader shoul… by on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXXII