Writing about web page http://www.38degrees.org.uk/page/s/save-our-forests#petition http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12314781
Comment on my previous entry:
I realise that the piece of fiction in my previous post simplifies the matter hugely, it is, after all, fiction – to a certain extent. See it more as the immediate emotional reaction when considering concepts such as these, and the kind of deep-down resentment that such things bring. I have no love of the ideas that the government is putting forward regarding our forests, but luckily for me, if the government keep their word then my area of Forest is safe, as it’s Heritage. But that’s the thing: governments keeping their promises. They went back on the tuition fees pledge, and that is the kind that many more people will actively react to, because it involves their money in a very immediate sense.
Not so many will protest to this, I fear, because the value of this forest areas are not perhaps so clear to people who do not live on or near them, to whom they are merely something that their taxes help to maintain and which exist on the boundaries of their perception of their own lives. This is of course something of a sweeping statement, there doubtless are people who live away from the forests who are still very much able to appreciate their importance, but I make it in an effort to illustrate a point.
The government say that although they intend to sell areas of local woodland and commercial woodland, they will retain Heritage Forests (essentially forests containing areas of rare ancient woodland, such as the New Forest and the Forest of Dean) within public ownership. I am fearful that this will not be the case, however. On top of the generally poor track record when it comes to politicians keeping their promises, the fact that the National Trust has expressed an intention of owning the New Forest throws things into doubt (see "The National Trust says it is looking at various options, including buying the most sensitive areas, such as the New Forest, itself" in article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12314781). Why would the National Trust even bother entertaining the notion of owning this Forest if there was no possibility of it happening? It would be nonsensical.
Although I do not technically live within the boundaries of the New Forest, rather just outside, on the edge of it, it has played a massive part in my life. I have grown up with it, fallen in love with it, and when I tell people where I live the Forest is the environment I describe. It colours my life and my thought processes massively, and although people may say that this skews my judgement, I do not see this as an issue. The New Forest has just recently been granted the status of National Park, and this is how it should remain: National. And why should people who live near smaller local woodlands, which do not have the prestige of the larger forests, lose their natural environments simply because the government is greedy? It is not an policy that I could ever agree to, and I urge you all to consider the issue seriously.