This blog has the purpose of demonstrating, through the use of two researchers' narrative accounts, the processes involved in undertaking a mixed methods literature review. Each blog entry represents a step along the research process, and whilst designed to be read as a step-by-step narrative account, entries can be read as stand-alone discussion points around which readers are invited to comment or offer their own experiences . The topics of investigation are different for each researcher, with one investigating 'interventions for depression in educational settings' and the other exploring 'communication, depression and primary care'. These topics were chosen as they represent two different purposes to which mixed methods research may be put- evaluations of interventions and descriptive studies. Each blog entry will have two documents attached to reflect each researcher's account; one will have an 'intervention' label, and the other a 'communication' label, to distinguish between them and allow readers to follow the development of each project through the blog entries. The blog entries are thus reflexive accounts of the trials, explorations, obstacles and illuminations encountered when undertaking mixed methods research reviews, and readers are encouraged to use the entries as a resource to better understand how literature reviews may be approached, and also to reflexively engage with their own research practices.
defining_the_task_communication.doc
mm_interventions_for_depression_defining_the_task.doc