August 09, 2004

I Robot

Before talking about the movie itself, I should say in passing that I chose to use the Spanish version of the movie poster in preference to the US one. I don't know why, but something about it just appealed to me more.

The film itself… well, it wasn't completely brain-dead and it didn't totally suck. That's progress for Will Smith, whose last two films were the disappointing Men in Black II and the utterly abysmal Bad Boys 2. One imagines that it was important to him not to make another total turkey this time around, and whether for that reason or just because the source material was better, he turns in a reasonable performance, toning down the wise-cracking (though reportedly the film-makers had to work hard to keep additional asinine one-liners from being added to suit him), and showing little hints of something other than glib cool.

The effects were a mixed bag; the city-scapes were nice (although they're easy to do, since they're basically just big paintings), but the underground motorways were rubbish, looking more like a video game than anything even vaguely real (why do film-makers persist in believing that future cities will move all their express lanes underground?) and although the robots were effective while still, once they got into running, jumping and fighting, they blew their credibility completely, as CGI creatures often do, by being faster and stronger than would be physically possible.

But the effects triumph of the movie is Sonny, the lead robot. Like Gollum in Lord of the Rings, he's played by an actor, so you get expression, body language and graceful, believable movement, and then the robotic appearance is painted over the actor in post-production. It works startlingly well, and makes the character compelling – and convincing – to watch, unlike all the pure-CGI robots.

You'll notice I've said nothing about the plot. That's partly because the film works better if you know as little as possible about it, but also because it's disappointing in a number of ways: first of all, it's described as "Suggested by the stories by Isaac Asimov", which seems a bit mean; second of all, although it is indeed derived from Asimov's well-known short stories, it suffers from the problem that lots of other films have been to the same well-spring before it. As much as the film is "suggested" by Asimov, it's also "suggested" by Terminator, Westworld, The Matrix, 2001, Blade Runner and many more. If you've seen any of these, you already know that Bad Things Happen When Robots Get Too Smart, and if you already know that, then I Robot has few revelations for you. And although the film attempts to consider questions of consciousness and morality, it does so rather feebly in comparison with just about any of its predecessors, or indeed the Asimov originals. Furthermore, by the end, the film clearly has no idea how to answer the philosophical questions it's raised, and glosses over the issues so completely that when it's finished at the cinema I'd like it to come round and do my skirting boards.

So three stars out of five for trying to be better than dumb and partially succeeding, plus a wonderful combination of acting and effects in Sonny. Docked two stars for ultimately abandoning ideas for explosions and some ropey, video-game style effects, especially in the fight sequences.

Finally some very mild spoiler thoughts if you've seen the film:-

  • What happened to the cat? Last we heard, it was in the trunk of the car. But we know what happened to the car.
  • The product placement was just appalling. Fed-Ex, Audi and – especially – Converse should just be ashamed of such blatant, embarrassing plugs.
  • I thought the violence done to the robots was interesting. At various times, they are crushed, dismembered and shot at point-blank range. Had they been human characters, their various fates would have been unwatchably horrific. But as robots (sentient robots, mind you, easily as smart as humans) it's apparently unproblematic and only 12A-cert to see carnage wrought on them. Curious.

- 6 comments by 4 or more people Not publicly viewable

[Skip to the latest comment]
  1. Sounds a tad disappointing. I read the Asimov books religiously as a kid, and absolutely loved them. I guess we can't expect too much of Hollywood :(

    Still going to see it though :)

    09 Aug 2004, 22:49

  2. I agree with the gripe about advertising. It is impossible to get immersed in the film when you feel like the advert break has started every 10 mins.

    The bit about violence to robots os not so valid because only Sonny and the evil mother robot are sentient. The rest are just sticking to their programming, although their programming gets updated at times.

    Not impressed with the film overall, althought thats not surprising with Will Smith. Whenever I watch him I can't help felling like I am watching the Fresh Prince of Bel-air.

    09 Aug 2004, 23:59

  3. Paul Strapps

    Was I watching the same film? Wasn't the cat left with old lady (his grandma I think)? There was definitely a scene where she was stroking the cat in her kitchen so the assumption was he'd left it with her.

    I thought the film was really good…...taking into account that it is a big budget hollywood film!!

    The only really unrealistic part I found was the spinning car in the tunnel…...come on we can do better than that! I also think they could have made the film longer which would have enabled them to explored the story line a little more, especially the climax to the film…..I mean is it really that easy!

    One thing I did notice about the film which made it more realistic was the use of technology in the future. Just about every film that I've seen that is set in the near future portrays a world that is almost unrecognisable with the use of technology, but the way technology in the film was integrated into the environment was quite realistic.

    Will Smith's performance was good and the CGI for Sunny was excellent! Worth watching on the big screen, I don't think it would have quite the same impact on a 32" widescreen TV.

    So all in all a good film if you don't set your expectations too high!! :)

    15 Aug 2004, 20:10

  4. John Dale

    > Wasn't the cat left with old lady (his grandma I think)?

    Oh yeah, maybe. The last I remember, he went to Susan's apartment and said "Do you like cats?". But the cat didn't end up there, and I didn't remember seeing it again. It could well have ended up with his grandma, but she was so irritating that I've blanked her out.

    16 Aug 2004, 21:03

  5. Sara Lever

    I havent seen the film yet but remember reading Asimov years ago. Wasnt the whole point of his stories that the Robots didnt run amok, the three laws preventing such from happening? Have Hollywood taken major liberties? Dunno if I want to see the film if its just an excuse for a load of special effects. I do like a good plot and it sounds like I could be disappointed by this film and perhaps Asimov would be too!

    18 Aug 2004, 18:23

  6. James Taylor

    Thanks for the link to this John. Yes, 'Yo, Robot' is way more entertaining as a title! :)

    Pretty much mirrors my thoughts on this.. its a shame to see a film with so much potential become more of an action packed explosion fest than something that makes you think a bit more.. the worst product placement HAD to be the Converse trainers, when Will Smith frequently made references to them as "2004 Vintage.." – ergh.

    Still, I thought it was great overall and will probably find its way into my DVD collection when its released.. probably just in time for christmas!!

    27 Aug 2004, 10:18


Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

Trackbacks

Search this blog

Tags

Blog archive

Loading…

Most recent comments

  • I am looking for a children's book I read in the early 1970s about a young girl who found a witch li… by Maggie on this entry
  • Thanks, John. There are always more books to be remembered, so it's good to have a decent source. by John Dale on this entry
  • I'm a bit late to the party, but in the future, you can always ask at http://www.reddit.com/r/tipofm… by John on this entry
  • I remember we had a series of books when I was around 10 years old in the early 80's. One of the boo… by Andrew Uttley on this entry
  • The trainers look great. I have been reviewing stuff on my blogs for a while and is actually the foc… by on this entry
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXIV