September 11, 2004

Change this

Writing about web page http://www.changethis.com/

The web site Change this is quite interesting. It's apparently not-for-profit, has no adverts or sponsorship, was created and is run by a small group of US interns, and publishes a range of articles (they call them manifestos) contributed by various authors, some well known, others not. Some of the focus is on business, but other articles cover science and personal issues. They also have an interesting model for future articles; they invite ideas from prospective authors, then publish them on the site and ask their readers to vote for the ones they think look interesting. And their copyright position is imaginative too; anyone can host any of their manifestos on their own site, or redistribute it to others in any way they wish, as long as they don't alter the content.

Some quotes from some manifestos that caught my attention:-

You need to make it both possible and profitable for employees to help customers. That generally means reviewing your operations to find the bottlenecks and disconnects that seemingly transform well-meaning employees into naysayers that refuse to help customers. (http://www.changethis.com/3.Less )
Fact No. 1: We all have 50 genuine priorities. Fact No. 2: If we get even two Big Things Done in a six-year tenure on the current job, we will have had a… Great Ride. Axiom No. 1: Therefore, what we choose not to do is at least as important, or more important, as what we choose to do. But effective "To-Don't" lists are far, far, more difficult than effective "To-Do" lists. (http://www.changethis.com/2.ThisIBelieve )

The other thing that I think is interesting about the site is that the manifestos are published as PDFs. I'm not generally a big fan of PDFs unless the document is intended specifically to be printed, so when I first looked at the site, this seemed like a big downside. But to my surprise, the PDFs they've created have gone some way towards making me think again about what PDFs can be good for, because they've done some smart things:-

  • They've chosen an aspect ratio for their PDFs that's well-suited to the screen, rather than well-suited for printing. So their PDFs are roughly 4:3-ish, and as a result, when you open one, it fits well into your browser window rather than leaving acres of empty space to its left and right.
  • They've set a sensible viewing default, "Fit to available space". So if your browser window is a reasonable size, the PDF fills it and the text is immediately a comfortable size.
  • They've hidden all the PDF toolbar cruft away so the document feels more like a regular web page.
  • They've put simple controls actually into the footer of the document, and also on the keyboard. So left & right arrow keys step through the document one page at a time, no scrolling needed.
  • They've designed the layout and typography to work well on-screen. The documents look good, use colour, space, fonts and imagery elegantly, and of course, as PDFs, they are pretty much device-independent.

I don't know much about how PDF files in this style are created, but it almost makes me wonder if files like these couldn't be used as simple learning objects.


- 3 comments by 1 or more people Not publicly viewable

  1. Robert O'Toole

    The pdf pages have a couple of other advantages. They look great with the browser at full screen, and would be useful in projected presentations. They also limit the amount of content per page.

    One of the original rationales behind the learning object approach was to encourage designers to break up the learning content into a series of activities, each of which is of a more screen friendly size. That gives a structure that is better adapted to online/on-screen use, and at the very least prevents people from writing interminably long pages in which the student just gets hopelessly lost.

    Of course some people working in some subjects have genuine problems with this activiy-centric approach.

    12 Sep 2004, 08:33

  2. Robert O'Toole

    And another advantage! You can write pdf files from Word. A common approach to writing LObs (invented I believe by Jim Hyndman) is to provide a Word template to academics that includes styles for defining the structure of the LOb. This was driven by the fact that academics feel more comfortable with Word than with most (trully awful) VLE authoring tools. A macro is run on the Word doc to turn it into IMS compliant XML and HTML content. Some people also output it into PDF with an IMS XML manifest file wrapping it up. Brookes are currently using a product called CourseGenie ( link ), which does the html and xml side of things, but not the PDF. The downside of this is that you have to teach academics to use Word styles, which is a challenge in itself!

    12 Sep 2004, 08:51

  3. tom

    interesting

    23 Mar 2005, 12:26


Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

Trackbacks

Search this blog

Tags

Blog archive

Loading…

Most recent comments

  • I remember we had a series of books when I was around 10 years old … by Andrew Uttley on this entry
  • The trainers look great. I have been reviewing stuff on my blogs fo… by Dilip Mutum on this entry
  • No movie as far as I know, but The Case of the Silver Egg was made … by John Dale on this entry
  • I checked this book out nearly a dozen times while I was growing up… by Tracy Ramsey on this entry
  • I don’t think it is predictable. Because in this world anythi… by emergency ration packs on this entry
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXII