December 07, 2017

An update on USS

As you may know, a deadline of 18th December has been set for the negotiations and discussions around Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS). This deadline has been set to ensure the Trustees can finalise their valuation by the due date of 30 June 2018. I am concerned that there is insufficient information available to us for us to form a view on possible options. We need to find a way for the two sides to come more closely together. In that light, I have today written to UUK to ask for some urgent modelling on different salary thresholds for future defined benefit accruals and the contribution rates they would require as well as the sensitivity of these models to key assumptions.

Pension valuations are very complex and there are significant interdependencies so it is difficult to reduce them down to simple models and preserve accuracy. However this modelling should provide indicative results of what might be possible.

I think it is important that we move away from the proposals for a zero threshold for the defined benefit scheme and consider more realistic thresholds and their associated contribution rates quickly before time runs out.

Although I am proposing the urgent modelling of different salary thresholds with the aim of securing a breakthrough before the 18th December deadline, this work should not preclude the continuing exploration of the possibility of obtaining government backing for the pension scheme in the future and the possible benefits that might bring. As I have said before a government backed scheme becomes an asset for the government, but would provide vital underpinning for the scheme’s members.

I will continue to keep you informed on progress.

sc_sig.jpg


- 2 comments by 1 or more people

  1. Jimmy Donaghey

    Stuart,
    Again, what you say on USS makes so much sense.

    It’s important to note though that the 30th June deadline is not absolute. For example, in 2014, that deadline was missed but the Pensions Regulator still signed it off. TPR as far as I know prefer for things to be right and late, rather than early and wrong! I’m not saying that deadlines should be ignored but I think making the deadline absolute serves the purposes of what UUK is seeking to do.

    Jimmy

    12 Dec 2017, 20:21

  2. Jacob Phelps

    Thank you for speaking up for us!
    I wish our leadership at Lancaster University would do the same!

    13 Dec 2017, 11:55


Add a comment

Name
Email
Anti-Spam Question
My t-shirt is red. What colour is my t-shirt?
Anti-Spam Answer
Comment


Your IP address will be recorded. -

You can not use HTML, but you can use our special markup -

December 2017

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
Nov |  Today  | Jan
            1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search this blog

Tags

Most recent comments

  • Thank you for speaking up for us! I wish our leadership at Lancaster University would do the same! by Jacob Phelps on this entry
  • Stuart, Again, what you say on USS makes so much sense. It's important to note though that the 30th … by Jimmy Donaghey on this entry
  • Thanks Claire – I think thats a lovely way of illustrating the issue! I'll remember that example and… by Christine Ennew on this entry
  • This is such a helpful and thoughtful reminder of something that we should all do by default but whi… by Claire Wightman on this entry
  • Previous comments from other senior University staff suggest that the proposed move to a defined sch… by Mary Corcoran on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXVIII