June 12, 2006

Not 3hrs is clearly the answer

Follow-up to 3hrs or not 3hrs, that is the question… from No I said DublIN marathon

I am so broken, so disappointed, I can't blog on this now. 3hrs 39mins of Hell. Technically 2hrs 10 mins of hell as the first 1hr 29 mins to half way seemed to be so good.

- One comment Not publicly viewable

  1. Chris May

    If it's any consolation, I know 2 people that ran it yesterday; one came in in 4:30 having expected 3:30 and another bailed after 18 miles (lots of people seemed to be dropping out). So I wouldn't get too hung up on not hitting your target. Apparently it was quite warm…

    12 Jun 2006, 22:17


Add a comment

You are not allowed to comment on this entry as it has restricted commenting permissions.

Trackbacks

June 2006

Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
May |  Today  | Jul
         1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30      

Search this blog

Tags

Most recent comments

  • Did you do it Dave? Hope you did! by sue law on this entry
  • Comments 2 and 3 were in response to me deleting the Comments 1 and 2 and changing the commenting pe… by David Haggart on this entry
  • We'd prefer you to delete such comments if you feel comfortable doing so. They don't do much to enha… by John Dale on this entry
  • He (and his logged IP) have a hell of a way of showing it by David Haggart on this entry
  • maybe he's looking for a friend by anonymous on this entry

Blog archive

Loading…
Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by BlogBuilder
© MMXIV