All 5 entries tagged Sources
View all 7 entries tagged Sources on Warwick Blogs | View entries tagged Sources at Technorati | There are no images tagged Sources on this blog
November 25, 2016
Please could you look at the following sources:
James - Remedies for the Wrongs of Woman
Yetunde - Bodeleian ballads (choose 2 or 3)
Zoe - A brief explanation...
Izzy - Contagious Diseases Act and summons
Amie - Butler
Louisa - Bodleian ballads (choose 2 or 3)
Abi - Acton
Aksana - Hansard on CD Acts
Aleemat - Stead
Oliver R-J - Power Cobbe
Mikka - Logan
Charlotte - trials of Oscar Wilde
Blessing - Old Bailey trials (choose 2 or 3)
Oliver B - Greenwood
October 14, 2016
1. The Question: ‘Comment on . . .’
The examination paper will ask only that you ‘comment on’ the gobbet. This is obviously a very general (perhaps even unhelpfully vague) requirement. However, the best way to think of it is to assume that you are being asked ‘What would a professional historian make of this extract?’ This might imply judgements about many things, including authorship; genre; geographical/chronological context; typicality/exceptionality; language etc. Think about how an academic historian might reasonably interpretand analysethe extract.
a) to allow you to demonstrate your understanding of the thematic issues of the module and your ability to use sources to throw light on them. Commonly, a gobbet will have a major theme which you ought to spot on the basis of your general reading, though it might also raise a number of other issues on which you might comment. What is being assessed here are your powers of analysis.
b) to allow you show to your grasp of the material, especially your ability to identify individuals or events referred to, to explain terms used and discussed, and to comment on the issues mentioned in a) above (not just generally but in the particular context raised by the gobbet). What is being assessed here is yourattention to detail.
Things to look out for: not all the key-note terms mentioned below will be relevant to every gobbet, but contextnearly always will be, and there should always be room for interpretation:
i. Date: you will alwaysbe given this, though be careful, this might be date published not date written
ii. Elucidation: of crucial terms, individuals, or events. Use your common sense, and do not feel you have to mention every obscure issue mentioned, but fit in as much as you can.
iii. Outcome: did the action foreseen or policy envisaged come to pass etc.? Does the contemporary analysis offered chime with more recent interpretations? Usually at the end of your answer.
i. Source. What is the genreof the gobbet (letter, official document, court record, sermon, speech etc.)? Was the source ‘public’ or ‘private’? Is it ‘reliable’, i.e. what reason(s) might we have for accepting its analysis, or not?
ii. Light thrown on the issue(s). It may quite often be the case that the (main) issue is the character or policy of the initiator (writer, speaker) of the gobbet. Another issue might be the light thrown on the audience. You should always ask what the gobbet might have to say on the relationship between initiator and audience, especially whether the nature of the audience influences the way the initiator writes, speaks or argues. It may be though that the gobbet is throwing potential light on a policy or a social attitude and if so, is this good or illuminating evidence? Is there other evidence in your sources (or secondary reading) linked to this?
iii. Comparison or contrast: have you got other sources confirming or contradicting the impression given in the gobbet? Is this gobbet typical or atypical of a particular genre?
iv. D.I.R.T.: does the diction, imagery, rhythmand toneof the gobbet (or of particular words and phrases within the gobbet) tell you something about the speaker or writer?
There is no one way to present answers in gobbets, though sentences and paragraphs are mandatory. It might be worthwhile to start with a pithy textual statement identifying initiators/recipients, time context and your assessment of the main theme. Try to get an interpretative element into this opening statement of the issue, as well as a contextual one. So a schematic framework for each gobbet answer would be:-
5. Things to Avoid
a) Do not simply paraphrase the words of the gobbet or state the obvious. Always try to add something to the text you have. Do not restate the issue: illustrate how the issue is elaborated.
b) Do not be too general on the context in the sense of taking the gobbet as a peg to write a mini-essay on the broad issues concerned. Try to concentrate on the specific aspects of the context that the gobbet is highlighting.
Remember there are no ‘right’ answers in gobbets. It is simply a matter of how clearly you can set out the context in which the gobbet occurs and how much illumination you can coax from it on the issue(s) it suggests.
Writing about web page http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/students/modules/hi398/timetable/seminar3-copy/
Please could you read and comment on the following sources (please see this post for information on how to comment on gobbets). Please can you also bring along and comment on one source that you found in the MRC.
The seminars next week will take the form of a workshop at the Modern Records Centre and will be at the usual times (10-12 Thur/Fri).
Please bring with you your student ID, pencils and digital camera/phone if you have one to record sources.
October 04, 2016
Writing about web page http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/students/modules/hi398
Welcome to Crime and Punishment in the Long Nineteenth Century
I look forward the the year ahead and I hope you enjoy the course.
Purpose of the Crime and Punishment Blog
This is an innovative module. Students are involved in all aspects of curriculum and assessment design. So this blog is fundamental to that process.
Students will be expected to post up summaries of their reading and analyses of documents before each seminar. They will also be able to add comments to each other's entries. This will provide an importance resource for revision and for essay work.The headlines of each entry will be added to the module homepage.
The blog will also be a repository for sources on crime and punishment in the long nineteenth century including films, books, articles and primary sources. If you see something interesting on TV, in the papers, at the cinema relevant to the module please share it with other students.
All students on the course have been added to the blog as contributors. That means they can post up entries and edit them. They can also add comments to each others entries.
You will have noticed from the timetable page of the module website that at present there is only one topic for forthcoming seminars. This is because the syllabus for the module is negotiated between all participants on the module. Each year, students decide among themselves the topics and sources they would like to study.
The suggestions may be broad (eg women and crime, punishment) or very specific (eg Sherlock Holmes novels, domestic violence). The module covers the period from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century and deals with all aspects of crime and punishment, policing, the law, courts etc. Take a look at the bibliography page for ideas for topics.
- Clive Emsley,Crime and Society in England, 1750-1900(recommended book for purchase)